Pros
- Faster heat-up time (60 seconds)
- Broader temperature range (40-220°C)
- Water pipe compatible
- Replaceable battery
- Lifetime warranty
- Optimized hardware and efficiency
Cons
- No passthrough charging function
- Slightly heavier than Air 2 (110g)
- Higher price than Air 2
- Battery requires regular replacement
Current offers from our partner shops
All prices come from automated shop queries. Some shop links are affiliate links.
Air MAX vs Solo 3 V2 for the Air MAX. You can find the complete overview on the main page.
Quick answer for "Arizer Air Max vs Solo 3 V2": we show which model fits which user type best.
Air MAX vs Solo 3 V2
Both are portable Arizer devices with convection heating and 220°C. The Solo 3 V2 has a larger internal battery (3500mAh) and USB-C. The Air MAX has a replaceable battery (18650, 2600mAh) - ideal for long sessions on the go with spare batteries.
| Feature | Air MAX | Solo 3 V2 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (from) | ~129 EUR | ~149 EUR |
| Heating | Convection | Convection |
| Max. temperature | 220°C | 220°C |
| Heat-up time | ~50 seconds | ~25 seconds |
| Battery | 2,600 mAh (18650) | 3,500 mAh (fixed) |
| Replaceable battery | Yes | No |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Glass mouthpieces | Yes (Air Stem) | Yes (Solo Stem) |
| Passthrough charging | No | Yes |
| Display | Yes (OLED) | Yes (OLED) |
| Weight | ~102 g | ~209 g |
| Warranty | Lifetime (heater) | Lifetime (heater) |
Related guides without comparison intent
More Air MAX topics
Price comparison charts for both devices
Current Best Prices
Air MAX Guides & Niches
The standard mouthpiece fits 14 mm joints. Arizer offers an adapter for 18 mm joints.
With the 5000 mAh battery, 10–15 sessions are realistic, depending on the temperature and draw duration.











Comments
No comments yet. Be the first!
Sign in to comment