Pros
- Faster heat-up than Solo 2 (~30 sec)
- OLED display for precise temperature reading
- Replaceable 18650 battery – unlimited runtime
- Glass stem for best flavor
Cons
- Slightly bulkier than competing models
- No app control
- Glass stem fragile during transport
Solo 2 MAX vs Solo 3 V2 for the Solo 2 MAX. You can find the complete overview on the main page.
Quick answer for "Solo 2 Max vs Solo 3 V2": we show which model fits which user type best.
Solo 2 MAX vs Solo 3 V2
Both Arizer portables with hybrid heating and glass vapor path. The Solo 3 V2 heats up in 15s (vs 30s), has 5000mAh battery and app control. The Solo 2 MAX is ~55 EUR cheaper.
| Feature | Solo 2 MAX | Solo 3 V2 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (from) | ~101 EUR | ~155 EUR |
| Heating | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Max Temperature | 220°C | 220°C |
| Heat-up Time | 30 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Battery | 3,400 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| App Control | No | Yes |
| Glass Vapor Path | Yes | Yes |
| Dosing Capsules | Yes | Yes |
| Passthrough Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Water Adapter | Yes | Yes |
Related guides without comparison intent
More Solo 2 MAX topics
Price comparison charts for both devices
Current Best Prices
Solo 2 MAX Guides & Niches
USB-C instead of Micro-USB, longer battery life (~3 vs ~2 hours), 3-year warranty instead of 2. Core performance (heating, vapor, glass airpath) is identical.
Up to 3 hours. At 5-minute sessions, that is roughly 35 sessions. The 18650 battery is replaceable.
50 to 220°C in 1-degree steps.
Yes, stainless steel capsules included.
Yes. The aroma tubes fit 14 mm and 18 mm adapters (sold separately).
No. All settings via buttons and display on the device.
The Mighty+ (from ~€229) has a wider chamber and heats faster. The Solo 2 MAX costs half, has a replaceable battery, and offers purer flavor via the glass airpath.
Soak the aroma tube in isopropyl alcohol (90%+), brush out the chamber.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first!
Sign in to comment